We haven't seen the end of the last-minute distractions, folks. Last week Hillary Clinton received one heck of an unwelcome surprise from FBI Director James Comey. It's standard Clinton modus operandi, though, to not let bad news linger. The easiest way to distract the public's attention from an unflattering story is introduce an even more shocking bit of news, and surprise, surprise, it will be about Donald Trump. Its coming, folks, so prepare yourselves. You may recall that just as Trump was beginning to gain traction in the campaign, the media "discovered" a flock of women with absurd but attention-getting accusations against the Republican nominee. With just over a week to go before the election, Clinton is desparate to make Trump once again the focus of negative press. I give the mainstream media high marks for just how quickly they circled the wagons around their candidate. All weekend long, it was one story after another, trashing James Comey and pointing out that his actions were not approved by Attorney General Lynch. You remember Lynch, I'm sure. She's the non-partisan (!) Justice Department boss who had that timely meeting with Bill Clinton on the runway in Phoenix. Loretta Lynch, who belatedly apologized for the meeting with Clinton only after it had become public. You can take her opinion on any issue regarding Hillary Clinton and you can throw it as far as the nearest Clinton Foundation office.
I don't know what shape the Clinton attack will take, but I suspect it will target Trump's reputation as a successful businessman. We haven't heard the last of the income tax return issue, and the "Trump University" card is always good for a few headlines. On the other hand, I can imagine that Julian Assange and Wikileaks are not happy to be relagated to "old news" by the FBI announcement. I'm convinced that Assange has a few cards left to play, and I can think of nothing I would appreciate more than a Wikileaks email dump with lots of embarrassing Clinton tidbits.
As election day approaches, I am growing more and more concerned with continual stories of early voting irregularities. Yesterday, I read that Democrats outvoted Republicans in early voting in Colorado by 27,000. Who provided this information, and shouldn't it be kept confidential? In addition, Reuters/IPSOS polling claims that Hillary Clinton will beat Donald Trump in national early voting by 15%. That figure is downright astounding and calls for closer scrutiny of the various registration and early voting operations. Frankly, I don't trust the Democratic registration and "voter assistance" programs. James O'Keefe has given us an inside look at what is clearly a process filled with fraudulent intentions. With the unwillingness of the Justice Department to investigate claims of voter fraud, can you blame the left for pushing the envelope?
Since the end of the national comventions, I have done what I can to try and keep honest voters informed. This election petrifies me for a host of reasons, but two stand out: I am convinced that the United States is on the brink of becoming a one-party state. In addition, the Constitution as we know it cannot survive the activist intentions of four, possibly five additional left-wing Supreme Court Justices. Keep in mind, Hillary Clinton will pass an Amnesty in her first year in office, and if a Republican Congress objects, she will pull an Obama and make use of Executive Action. An additional fifteen to twenty million Democratic voters is at stake, folks. For persons worried about the legal right to own a weapon, or for Christians concerned with recent attacks on everything faith-based, you can guarantee that a left-wing activist Supreme Court will be determined to take away your gun and your Bible. These are the equities in jeopardy, my friends. This is why I have been so vocal about sharing these blog posts, and trying to get at least five people a week to either register (to late) or promise to support Trump on November 8. Nothing less than the future of our Republic is at stake.
No comments:
Post a Comment