Twitter and email info

Showing posts with label Sultan Qaboos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sultan Qaboos. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Who Are The Gulf States, Exactly?

Links: A. United Arab Emirates Wikipedia
           B. Oman Wikipedia
           C. Kuwait Wikipedia
           D. Qatar Wikipedia
           E. Bahrain Wikipedia

When I was a young boy, I was fascinated with maps.  I spent hours trying to determine the methodology for the color-coding of different countries, and also did my best to learn the correct pronunciations of the countless rivers, mountains, towns, and cities.  When I grew a little older, I became interested in history, so the Atlas section of my family's Encyclopedias got put down, and the Encyclopedias themselves got put to use.  Not surprisingly, I gravitated towards some places more than others (it might be déjà vu, reincarnation, or it might be coincidence, but most people who look at maps and globes will feel an odd familiarity with certain place names).  I was drawn to a political entity known as "The Trucial States".  I counted seven oddly-shaped little places, all hugging the south shore of the Persian Gulf.  In my mind's eye, I pictured camels, men in white, flowing robes with rope-ring head pieces to keep their head-covering on, tents, and sand......lots and lots of sand.  This description wasn't far from the truth back in the 1930s and 1940s.  As far a colonial influences go, the Persian Gulf was a British lake.  Following the death of the Ottoman Empire in 1922, the British happily moved into the void.

In most of Great Britain's colonies, calls for independence put pressure on the British government to relinquish control to the indigenous peoples.  In some countries, such as Kenya, Nigeria and Ghana, the process was observed internationally, and there was great optimism that the transition from one form of government to another, would go smoothly.  Interestingly enough, the Trucial States were in no hurry to separate from great Britain.  The importance of oil in the region was on everyone's mind, and the various Shaykhs of the Trucial States enjoyed having the protection of the British navy and Air Force.  It was actually the British who insisted on the Declaration of Independence in 1971.  The seven Trucial States, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Fujairah, Ajman, Sharjah, Um al-Quwain, and Ras al-Khaimah, each had its own Shaykh.  Representatives from the seven Shaykhdoms met and decided to form a federation, which called itself the United Arab Emirates (UAE).  Abu Dhabi and Dubai are larger in size and population than the other five Emirates, and there was some concern that the smaller Shaykhdoms might feel slighted because of the greater influence that Dubai and Abu Dhabi naturally possessed.  But it never really has been a problem.  The Emirates are incredibly wealthy, and the largesse has been distributed in a smart and effectual manner.  The UAE has a surprisingly large and well-equipped Armed Forces (thank you, United States), and shares one common currency.  Certain political positions are granted on a rotating basis, while others are voted upon. The leaders of the UAE have traditionally been from Abu Dhabi and Dubai, but they have done such a stellar
Burj Khalifa Tower, Dubai
job negotiating the Emirates away from conflict and towards greater wealth, that no one dares complain.  The UAE has become a popular tourist destination, especially for the British (just don't get caught kissing in public, especially if you are gay).  The Emirates prides itself on having some of the tallest buildings in the world, including the astounding Burj Khalifa Tower in Dubai.  The UAE can also be proud of its research and discoveries in desalinization.  A great deal of Emirati wealth has found its way to the California real estate market, especially high-end shopping center projects.  The current Prime Minister of the UAE, Mohammed bin Rashid al-Mahktoum, is a true lover of horse racing, and owns stables and breeding centers in Australia and the United States.

I love Oman.  Of all the gulf States, and I include Saudi Arabia and Yemen in this instance, Oman, has managed to follow its own, independent course.  Oman, which has a relatively small population, has extremely good relations with the west.  Sultan Qaboos, who deposed his father in 1970 during what has been Oman's only internal conflict of the modern era, has not shown a fear of modern development, and welcomes tourists from Europe and the United States.  The women of Oman do not suffer under the same prohibitions as exist in Saudi Arabia.  The Omani Army is well-trained and equipped (mostly by the Brits), but for practical purposes is too small to be useful for anything other than self-defense and internal conflict.  I have a personal affinity for Oman because it is an absolutely lovely place.  Muscat, the capital city, is filled with buildings that could have
Fort Al-Jalali, Muscat, Oman
been plucked right out of the seventeenth century.  The original Portuguese fort built in 1580 to guard the entrance to Muscat (Fort Al-Jalali) continues its timeless duty of protecting the Omanis from Pirates and other ne'er do wells.  The Omani people are a pleasure to look at, and take great care in their appearance without obvious signs of vanity.  Qaboos has been a loyal friend to the United States and western Europe since he first sat on the throne.  I'm sure at one time or another, extremists have attempted to set-up shop in Oman.  But I guessing that they didn't make much progress, as the people seem very loyal to their sovereign and content with their lives.

Kuwait reminds me of the opposite of Oman in many ways.  Although the Al-Sabah family keeps a tight grip on power, the political environment in Kuwait has become much noisier as of late.  The Sabahs have to contend with a very vocal women's right lobby and a population that at times appears sympathetic to Islamic extremist groups.  Was it that long ago that Saddam Hussein's Army poured into Kuwait, emptied the stores and dumped babies out of incubators?  A Kuwaiti friend of mine explained why a segment of the population of Kuwait has become sympathetic to the jihadis. From 1990 to the present, the United States military has had a large presence in Kuwait.  Many Kuwaitis are not happy with the inevitable influence that this group of young Americans has had on their country.  This includes the relaxation of attitudes regarding liquor consumption, the fraternization between Kuwaiti women and U.S. servicemen, and the unavoidable evolution of the Kuwaiti economy to accommodate all those U.S. dollars.  Another unintended result of the U.S. presence is the perceived growth of the Christian community and the movement away from the teachings of Islam.  A not insignificant percentage of native-born Kuwaitis are convinced that Kuwait needs to embrace a traditional brand of Islam that will remove the Game Boys, the mini-skirts and the six packs of Budweiser.  It is rumored that a well-placed member of the Sabahs is very sympathetic towards conservative Islam and is working hard to influence his family.  Help may be on the way.  Its my understanding that the draw-down of U.S. military forces overseas includes most of our Army facilities in Kuwait.

Forgive me for including Qatar and Bahrain in the same paragraph.  It's a bad habit that is shared by many.  Qatar is a small but very wealthy country that borders Saudi Arabia on the west and the Perisan Gulf on the east.  The Qataris have the highest per capita income in the world (according to Wikipedia), and Qatar itself has over 100 billion dollars in investments worldwide.  Each year those investments grow from 30 to 40 billion dollars.  The Qatari government, ostensibly loyal to Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, has been accused of supporting extremist causes, including Hamas.  The Qataris deny supporting any extremist groups in Gaza, Lebanon or the West Bank, but Qatar readily admits to supporting the Palestinian people.  With regards to Syria, Qatar has been supporting various factions opposed to Syrian President Bashir al-Assad.  In fact, Qatar is one of the nations included in President Obama's anti-ISIS air campaign coalition.  I'm still trying to determine who exactly were the Qataris supporting before the air campaign?  At first glance, it would appear that the Qataris were supporting ISIS, a claim which they deny.  If Qatar was not supporting Assad, then who on the rebel side was receiving funding from Qatar?  Sadly, the five Guantanamo-based terrorists that Barrack Obama traded for the release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl were deposited in Qatar, with the understanding that the Qataris would keep them under thumb. Fat chance....its my understanding that at least two have already rejoined the struggle against "The Great Satan".  We don't have much to say about Bahrain.  In 2011, the ruling al-Khalifa house was given quite a scare with the almost spontaneous demonstrations in the capital city Manama.    Eventually the police and riot control units were mobilized to disperse the crowds and they seemed to disappear as quickly as they assembled, although some human rights organizations claim that whenever people congregate in the same fashion, the police move in quickly.  Half of Bahrain's 1.2 million population are working foreigners.  Bahrain has a strong economy, built on oil just like its fellow Gulf States.  Bahrain has arguably the closest relationship with the United States, as the U.S. Navy has a base in Bahrain and the U.S. military trains and equips the Bahraini military.  Recently tensions arose between Qatar and Bahrain which resulted in the recalling of ambassadors; but that issue appears to have since resolved itself, and diplomatic personnel have returned to their jobs.




Friday, September 12, 2014

Oman, UAE, and Saudi Arabia...Gulf Royalty Deluxe

(As was the case yesterday, there will be no link(s) for today's post. Google is replete with information on all three nations.)

Oman is my absolute favorite Gulf monarchy.  I used to have a hot love affair going with the UAE until I started working as an intelligence officer and took a peek behind the curtain.  The current ruler of Oman, Sultan Qaboos, replaced his father in a familial coup in 1970.  Until that time, the history of Oman read like something straight out of One Thousand and One Nights (Arabian Nights).  During the mid-20th century Oman was a feudal territory under the protection of Great Britain.  The territory we now know as Oman was ruled by both the Imam of the Imamate of Oman (Ghalib al-Hinai) and the Sultan of Muscat (Said bin Taimur), the father of today's ruler Sultan Qaboos.  When oil concessions became a hot issue, the Sultan tried to squeeze out the Imam.  The war lasted for some time, as the Imam and his supporters managed to disappear into the inaccessible Jebel Ackdar.  With the help of a few companies of African soldiers and two used British armored cars, the Sultan was able to chase Imam al-Hinai into exile in Saudi Arabia.  After deposing his father, Sultan Qaboos took firm measures to make Oman's wealth work for the Omani people.  The nation was modernized, the economy was expanded, and resources were dedicated to Health and Education.  I chose to provide a bit more historic background than usual because I don't really have anything dastardly to say about Qaboos or Oman.  The Sultan has kept his country basically devoid of the type of Islamic fundamentalism that has invaded the aristocracy in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.  Oman is a beautiful, safe country to visit, and a model for any Gulf nation serious about rejecting Islamic fundamentalist terrorism.  If you want to meet all those peaceful Muslims President Obama keeps gurgling about, book a flight to Muscat.

The United Arab Emirates are a true Federation of seven separate Arab monarchies (Emirates).  They are, in no particular order, Ras al-Khaimah, Umm al-Quwain, Ajman, Sharjah, Fujairah, Abu Dhabi and Dubai.  Ostensibly all seven emirates are supposed to be equal.  At is birth (1971), it was decided that the UAE would be governed by the Federal Supreme Council, which consisted of the ruling emir of each respective emirate.  One of the emirs is selected as President.  In reality, the UAE and its politics are dominated by Abu Dhabi.  The first President of the UAE was Sheikh Zayed of Abu Dhabi, and the current President is his son Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan.  The Emirates are incredibly wealthy and are fond of skyscrapers and modern shopping centers.  The Emirates have become a prime tourist destination, particularly for the Brits.  A great deal of money is spent on research, especially as it relates to desalinization and creating agriculturally productive land from desert.  The Emiratis have accomplished a great deal in a very short time.  Now for the half-empty part of the glass.  The UAE has a very effective intelligence service, which is aggressively active both internally and externally.  This service has very close relations with a number of western intelligence agencies, and likes to give the impression that it is anti-Islamic extremist.  In reality, the UAE is just short of being a police state.  Foreigners are watched closely, and natives are watched even more closely.  Practices unbecoming a good Muslim are not allowed.  No kissing in public, and Gays, please stay in Key West.  Prostitution is illegal but widely available, usually serviced by women from the more destitute Russian Republics ("he promised me a job as a secretary"....you get the picture).  The United States is heavily invested in its relationship with the UAE, who spend a great deal of money every year on U.S. manufactured F16s, tanks, and other various military equipment.  On occasion the intelligence community will hear a rumor that maybe one or more of the royal families is secretly providing support to terrorist organizations.  But no one wants to believe this kind of bad news.  If any civil service and intelligence agency could keep that kind of secret, it would be the Emiratis.  Although he is only Prime Minister of the UAE as opposed to President, keep your eye on Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum of Dubai; he is a very interesting multi-billionaire.  He loves the horses and keeps stables in Australia.  He is quite the charmer and very well educated (I would have guessed Eton and Oxford but I would have been wrong).  Something about this guy rubs me the wrong way.  I love all the good things that the Emiratis contribute to the world, but I'm just not ready to say I trust their leadership, at least not when it comes to possible confidential relationships with fundamentalist groups.

House of Saud: More than likely I will be writing a post that is totally dedicated to the Saudis before the year is over.  The House of Saud was the victor in the early 20th century battle for the Arabian peninsula (The vanquished Hashemites had to settle for Trans-Jordan and Iraq).  The Saudi monarchy has always been fiercely and unapologetically conservative and has cultivated a mutually beneficial relationship with both the United States and the United Kingdom.  Everyone out of grade school is aware that the Saudis sit on a butt load of oil, and have a very small population on whom to spend its oil revenues.  History has given the Saud family reason to be concerned about security.  During the reign of Saddam Hussein in neighboring Iraq, Saudi Arabia had to consider the real possibility of an Iraqi invasion.  When it comes to military supplies, the Saudis are a mirror of their Emirati cousins, with Abrams tanks and F16s filling out the Saudi military equipment ledger.  The Saud family has been masters of cultivating a close relationship with the United States (a true example of civil liberties) while enforcing draconian laws that keep women from driving cars.  The Wahhabi movement is often used to scare up enemies of Saudi Arabia, but few people ever take the time to learn what the term "Wahhabi" means.  It is a conservative, Sunni doctrine which is no more invasive than a dozen other Muslim movements.  The real problem with Saudi Arabia as I see it, is the size of the royal family.  King Abdullah (and Faisal before him) do not want war a religious war with the west.  But as the family grows larger and wealth proliferates, it has become impossible to keep track of everybody and every penny.  And we aren't only taking about the Sauds.  Other families closely related to the House of Saud (bin-Ladens) also exercise great wealth.  Can Abdullah control extremist sympathies within his own family?  Can he affect the flow of money out of the Kingdom?  This isn't to say that Abdullah himself does not harbor dislikes in the Arab world.  If a particular terrorist group were working against a perceived enemy of the Kingdom, no doubt Abdullah would send them a few bucks.  All in all, I do not see Saudi Arabia as being a particular supporter of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism.  The Saudis are very fond of giving generously to various Islamic Aid and Educational Organizations.  But who knows what might be happening under the guise of succor, which may be too deeply embedded to be seen from the top of the Saudi throne?