As I watched last week's initial Republican Presidential Debate, I made a point to jot down any comments from the various candidates on the issue of National Security. Its not a simple topic. Some people consider National Security to be limited to any external threat to the United States, including terrorism and rampant illegal immigration, for example. I include our runaway national debt and unwillingness to control spending as a major threat to National Security, but many consider this to be a domestic issue. I will include the National Debt in our discussion, but refrain from getting into the weeds. My criteria for inclusion in the list of threats to National Security include any development which threatens the existence of our republic. I am a reasonable man, and I am an optimist when it comes to issues that are exclusively controlled by the American people. But our National Debt is beginning to reach the point of no return. I am no longer able to calculate how this issue can be brought under control by the current budgetary process. Even if Congress and the Executive Branch were in agreement, we can only dedicate so much to cutting the national debt, before our ability to pay social security and related social entitlements is threatened What about National Defense? Can we continue to have a dynamic and proactive defense industry if we start to cut back on military spending? The reality is, every fiber of our national government could use a diet. Waste is rampant in every nook and cranny of Washington, DC. So many elements of our Federal Government have unlimited access to taxpayers money, that they have begun to see it AS THEIR OWN. And during the past six years, the problem has exploded, as the Obama Administration has created new and previously unconsidered ways to expand the number of government checks being delivered. Just how much has the debt grown under Obama? I've heard many answers, including the politically driven "the debt comes from Bush and his illegal wars" argument. The ignorance of some people is worn like a badge of honor. Our economy GROWS in wartime, it does not contract. Its true that after the conclusion of a war, the economy faces the added pressures of an expanded work force, and fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan did not come cheap. But the actual expenditures by the Federal Government to the entitlements industry absolutely dwarfs the cost of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our treasury bonds have been scarfed up by the Government of China at an unprecedented rate, which means that as long as we consider ourselves a solvent and viable economic state, we are responsible to the Chinese for those bonds. When did we decide that it was okay to just keep spending money and balance it by selling treasury bonds to nations that do not have our best interests in mind?
As for the various candidates and their positions on National Security, we have two different parties to examine. The Democratic race, which once appeared to be an anointing party for Hillary Clinton, has become fluid in the last few months, as Hillary loses the reigns of her own "damage control" machine. I can't see Bernie Sanders of Vermont, the only admitted Socialist in DC, winning the nomination, although it would usher in an era of honesty of sorts. We've been living under a Socialist government of rampant government control and expansion and executive action for six years....at least Bernie is honest about his motivations. But a Sander's nomination would hand the presidency to the GOP, so don't hold your breath on his candidacy. Watch our for Jim Webb of Virginia. The media has appointed him as a moderate in order to make him more attractive to the independent voter, but Jim Webb is no moderate. Such a creature doesn't exist in the Democratic Party of 2015. Joe Biden is chewing up his shorts in excitement of a possible presidential run, but he is limited by his late arrival and his questionable ability to raise money. As for National Security, Biden, Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren of the Massachusetts Tribe will move the United States closer to our European allies and their guilt-ridden, blind approach to international issues. These three stooges would continue the path we are on, with useless sanctions and failed diplomacy "ad nauseam". Take a look around the world today and see the result of the European and Obama model of foreign policy: ISIS running free in Syria and putting the Iraqis to flight, and expanding to every inhabited continent; Russia banging the expansionist war drum louder than ever, and North Korea still being North Korea. As for the Chinese, through innovative and determined use of espionage and diplomacy, the Chinese have turned the United States into a technological client-state. Its fascinating that the Chinese and U.S. researchers always seem to be working on the same projects simultaneously, with almost concurrent successes. I'm looking for a candidate that will rid our Universities and Research Laboratories of Chinese spies, and press criminal charges on politicians who take campaign money to lobby for Chinese defense interests in Congress (hello, Bill Clinton).
The Republican candidates present a mixed-bag. At the moment, when they must appeal to the more conservative Republican voter, everyone becomes a hawk, including Jeb Bush. But I have a message for anyone who is soft on illegal immigration: you will not win the nomination. Even though most of the press attempts to downplay the fact that Republican voters are incensed by the Amnesty issue, the candidates can't avoid the results of the ballot box. Watching Bush, Rubio, Lindsay Graham, and Chris Christie become hawks on immigration will be good comedy, but they will be exposed for their true nature by the fulsome and detailed opinions already given. Yes, immigration is a National Security issue, and it is directly tied into concerns regarding domestic terrorism. The consistent hawks include Ted Cruz, Rand Paul (its true), Donald Trump, Scott Walker, Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina. I can't speak to Huckabee, Jindal, Kasich, Perry or Santorum on this issue, because basically, along with Fiorina I see this second-tier as running for Vice President or for an early exit. I can't take Donald Trump seriously on any foreign policy issue, regardless of his status in the polls. He is a candidate of sound-bites, and the GOP electorate will begin to tire of hearing the same "clever phrases" repeated over and over again. Each time he makes a comment about "taking the fight to ISIS", or "building a wall on the Mexican border", I find myself asking for more....how, Mr. Trump? Where's the Beef? While the other candidates release documents highlighting their plans for controlling immigration and tackling the debt, all Trump does is issue platitudes and phrases. Go home, Donald.
As with all the issues, I find myself drawn to two candidates: Ted Cruz and Dr. Ben Carson. I like Ted Cruz because he is not afraid to follow through on his campaign convictions. How we have grown weary of Republican politicians who say one thing on the campaign trail, and then return to the protective political cocoon of Washington DC, where everyone works together to ensure that they all get re-elected- to hell with the best interests of the nation. Ted Cruz is a true conservative who is not afraid to make a mistake, as long as his motivations and integrity are beyond question. Cruz is a TRUE CONSERVATIVE and I agree with him on every issue. He realizes that the threat from both ISIS and Al-Qaeda is much closer to home than most people realize, and that our borders have become as porous as a broken salt shaker. The FBI does amazing work, considering the politicizing of the Justice Department. These men and women are out in the field everyday, looking for sleeper cells in our own communities, while the Obama Administration refuses to use the words "Islamic Terrorist" to describe these religiously motivated murderers. Be that as it may, the FBI has been heavily distracted from the anti-terror focus to concentrate on "race crimes". I will leave that subject alone for now.
I like Rand Paul because he brings a streak of Libertarianism to the contest. He is a tireless worker, and I have only disagreed with him on one subject (Cuba). Even though Rand Paul represents the solid-red state of Kentucky, his nomination would probably swing neighboring Ohio into the GOP orbit. Unfortunately, nothing Scott Walker does will get Wisconsin to vote Republican, and I wonder about Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio being able to deliver Florida. They didn't in the last election, if memory serves me correctly. I think Rand Paul understands the threat posed by China and Russia, and is appropriately galvanized to deal with the ISIS issue. But my current choice, Dr. Ben Carson, brings something to the discussion of foreign affairs, that we haven't seen in a very long time. Carson is not an elected official, and has not rubbed elbows with the Ambassador from so-and-so and negotiators from this place and that. I believe Carson sees the world as a private U.S. citizen; in other words, as we do. His concern is for the protection of our Democracy and the opportunities and freedoms that existed which allowed him to become a world-renowned surgeon and philanthropist. He is not a seasoned politician, and I have my concerns about his ability and willingness to rip apart his opponent during a presidential debate (remember Romney?). But what a change to consider someone sitting in the Oval Office who can remember what its like to drive their own car, and can carry on a discussion with real people about grocery prices, medical and insurance costs, and the fear of terrorism finding its way into our cities and towns. Carson has been criticized because of his lack of political experience; he has not negotiated a treaty with a foreign government or sat on a Congressional Committee reviewing an international development or incident. And that may be his greatest asset.
Showing posts with label Jeb Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeb Bush. Show all posts
Monday, August 10, 2015
Friday, June 19, 2015
So many Republican candidates, so little time........
Links: A. Jeb Bush running for President.
B. Donald Trump running for President.
Recently a well-publicized political cartoon highlighted a clown car, with one Republican presidential candidate after another stepping out of the car door. I thought it was a clever cartoon, and I had no problem understanding the intended point: that the field of candidates on the GOP side has become so large, that its beginning to resemble a circus. And who am I too argue? Just a quick review of some of the occupants of the clown car explains why the media has no intention of taking the Republican Primary Election seriously, at this not until convention-time. The first funny-face we recognize in the back seat is businessman and entrepreneur Donald Trump. I have no idea why Trump us running for president. He must realize that even if he were to somehow win the GOP nomination, he would never win a national contest. So what is Trump's game? Is it all about publicity, and hawking some new casino or television program? Obviously publicity is part and parcel of Trump's campaign; the guy can't have a bowel movement without a camera running in the bathroom. Maybe I'm being a bit unfair, but I have listened the few times that I've heard Trump actually discuss policy. He comes across as a fiscal conservative and a social moderate. I see nothing new here, and certainly nothing very deep. He claims to be worth nine billion dollars. I assume, when you have that much money, that you don't need to fund raise, right? If Trump announces that he will use only his own personal funds to run his campaign, then he just might win me over. He is a very hard-working man, who doesn't like to fail. I have a great deal of respect for his accomplishments as a man and a businessman. But I want Trump to pay for his own election, and I'm not holding my breath.
And in this corner of the crazy clown car we have a member of America's most esteemed conservative (?) political family, former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush is a nice man. I've never met anyone who would say otherwise. He is considerate, polite and generous. I'm sure he was raised well. He was a fine Governor of Florida, and at the right time, would probably make a decent president. I hate to join the chorus, Jeb, but I'm just not ready for another Bush (or Clinton, for that matter). I have to believe that our nation is deeper than that. When I look at the line-up standing outside of the clown-car, I am astonished by some of the familiar faces that I see. And Jeb Bush is the most recognizable. For me personally, I am a bit insulted that certain politicians keep coming around for another shot. Do they really believe that the United States can't survive without them? Are they so important, that we can't find someone with less baggage and a newer perspective to be our nominee? I won't vote for Jeb Bush unless he is the nominee. Same rule applies for Mike Huckabee. I want new ideas, new visions and fewer reminders about the past. I remember it well enough on my own, thank you. For the same reasons, if I were a Democrat I wouldn't be voting for Hillary Clinton.
Another look into the clown car takes us to Rick Santorum, whose been sitting on the jump seat. Just like Jeb and Mike Huckabee, I really like Rick Santorum. Of the three, he is the one most likely to get my attention. I supported Rick in vain during the last few primaries in 2012, but if I'm not mistaken, Santorum was around in 2008 as well. And this following an unsuccessful effort to hold on to his Senate seat in Pennsylvania. This is a perfect example of the issue that I find so frustrating. Rick, I know you love public service and you feel strongly about your ideas for our country, but it would do you well to find something else to do for a while. I am not alone when I say I'm not looking for anymore politicians-for-life, regardless of their honesty, integrity and generosity, all of which Rick Santorum has in abundance. If Santorum had taken a break in 2012, and spent a few years driving his own car, writing his own checks, and living the life of a middle class American, I would be much more predisposed to his candidacy. But Santorum has basically been running for the GOP nomination since 2012, even though he hasn't had a whole lot of resources. I have tremendous admiration for Santorum; I would have appreciated a Catholic nominee, and I agree with Rick on every issue. But I made up my mind that in 2016, I would vote for the candidate that I believe our founding fathers would have supported.
Although I would be very comfortable with a Rand Paul nomination, or Ted Cruz, I am sticking with my original choice and voting for Dr. Ben Carson. I am determined to support a non-politician, regardless of the comments I hear on Fox and CNN that Dr. Carson does not debate well or speak smoothly enough to win the presidency. Bullshit. I am really excited about the opportunity to vote for someone who has spent their life saving lives and bringing new life into this world. I understand his ideas regarding the economy and our tax code because he takes a simple approach and like most Americans, I'm a simple man. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are not the only other candidates that I respect; under different circumstances I would vote for Rick Perry and Marco Rubio (a few more years, Marco). And Carly Fiorino would make a tremendous Vice Presidential nominee; I would love to see her in a debate! I'm leaving off a few of the other announced candidates. I really don't know what to make of Lindsay Graham. Half the time I love him and half the time I'm convinced he's a closet Democrat. Scott Walker is a solid Republican who has stood up to the best that the Unions and the left have to offer. My issue with Walker has nothing to do with him, per se. I can't support someone as the Republican nominee for president, who is the governor of a state that will never vote Republican. It an important factor. Carson will finally help the GOP make inroads into the African American electorate; Rand Paul is strong in Ohio and Rubio and Bush can deliver Florida. From the perspective of the electoral map, what does Walker deliver? Not even his own state of Wisconsin. It unfortunate, but true.
So we've had our peak into the clown car, and the circus is getting ready to start. The media is having a field day with the number and variety of GOP candidates, and I'm all for letting them have their fun. When the Republican convention rolls around, the party will be united and our one candidate will be battle-tested and sharp. I'm optimistic that those of us hoping for a more conservative administration in 2016 will see a GOP making fewer mistakes this time around.
B. Donald Trump running for President.
Recently a well-publicized political cartoon highlighted a clown car, with one Republican presidential candidate after another stepping out of the car door. I thought it was a clever cartoon, and I had no problem understanding the intended point: that the field of candidates on the GOP side has become so large, that its beginning to resemble a circus. And who am I too argue? Just a quick review of some of the occupants of the clown car explains why the media has no intention of taking the Republican Primary Election seriously, at this not until convention-time. The first funny-face we recognize in the back seat is businessman and entrepreneur Donald Trump. I have no idea why Trump us running for president. He must realize that even if he were to somehow win the GOP nomination, he would never win a national contest. So what is Trump's game? Is it all about publicity, and hawking some new casino or television program? Obviously publicity is part and parcel of Trump's campaign; the guy can't have a bowel movement without a camera running in the bathroom. Maybe I'm being a bit unfair, but I have listened the few times that I've heard Trump actually discuss policy. He comes across as a fiscal conservative and a social moderate. I see nothing new here, and certainly nothing very deep. He claims to be worth nine billion dollars. I assume, when you have that much money, that you don't need to fund raise, right? If Trump announces that he will use only his own personal funds to run his campaign, then he just might win me over. He is a very hard-working man, who doesn't like to fail. I have a great deal of respect for his accomplishments as a man and a businessman. But I want Trump to pay for his own election, and I'm not holding my breath.
And in this corner of the crazy clown car we have a member of America's most esteemed conservative (?) political family, former Governor of Florida Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush is a nice man. I've never met anyone who would say otherwise. He is considerate, polite and generous. I'm sure he was raised well. He was a fine Governor of Florida, and at the right time, would probably make a decent president. I hate to join the chorus, Jeb, but I'm just not ready for another Bush (or Clinton, for that matter). I have to believe that our nation is deeper than that. When I look at the line-up standing outside of the clown-car, I am astonished by some of the familiar faces that I see. And Jeb Bush is the most recognizable. For me personally, I am a bit insulted that certain politicians keep coming around for another shot. Do they really believe that the United States can't survive without them? Are they so important, that we can't find someone with less baggage and a newer perspective to be our nominee? I won't vote for Jeb Bush unless he is the nominee. Same rule applies for Mike Huckabee. I want new ideas, new visions and fewer reminders about the past. I remember it well enough on my own, thank you. For the same reasons, if I were a Democrat I wouldn't be voting for Hillary Clinton.
Another look into the clown car takes us to Rick Santorum, whose been sitting on the jump seat. Just like Jeb and Mike Huckabee, I really like Rick Santorum. Of the three, he is the one most likely to get my attention. I supported Rick in vain during the last few primaries in 2012, but if I'm not mistaken, Santorum was around in 2008 as well. And this following an unsuccessful effort to hold on to his Senate seat in Pennsylvania. This is a perfect example of the issue that I find so frustrating. Rick, I know you love public service and you feel strongly about your ideas for our country, but it would do you well to find something else to do for a while. I am not alone when I say I'm not looking for anymore politicians-for-life, regardless of their honesty, integrity and generosity, all of which Rick Santorum has in abundance. If Santorum had taken a break in 2012, and spent a few years driving his own car, writing his own checks, and living the life of a middle class American, I would be much more predisposed to his candidacy. But Santorum has basically been running for the GOP nomination since 2012, even though he hasn't had a whole lot of resources. I have tremendous admiration for Santorum; I would have appreciated a Catholic nominee, and I agree with Rick on every issue. But I made up my mind that in 2016, I would vote for the candidate that I believe our founding fathers would have supported.
Although I would be very comfortable with a Rand Paul nomination, or Ted Cruz, I am sticking with my original choice and voting for Dr. Ben Carson. I am determined to support a non-politician, regardless of the comments I hear on Fox and CNN that Dr. Carson does not debate well or speak smoothly enough to win the presidency. Bullshit. I am really excited about the opportunity to vote for someone who has spent their life saving lives and bringing new life into this world. I understand his ideas regarding the economy and our tax code because he takes a simple approach and like most Americans, I'm a simple man. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz are not the only other candidates that I respect; under different circumstances I would vote for Rick Perry and Marco Rubio (a few more years, Marco). And Carly Fiorino would make a tremendous Vice Presidential nominee; I would love to see her in a debate! I'm leaving off a few of the other announced candidates. I really don't know what to make of Lindsay Graham. Half the time I love him and half the time I'm convinced he's a closet Democrat. Scott Walker is a solid Republican who has stood up to the best that the Unions and the left have to offer. My issue with Walker has nothing to do with him, per se. I can't support someone as the Republican nominee for president, who is the governor of a state that will never vote Republican. It an important factor. Carson will finally help the GOP make inroads into the African American electorate; Rand Paul is strong in Ohio and Rubio and Bush can deliver Florida. From the perspective of the electoral map, what does Walker deliver? Not even his own state of Wisconsin. It unfortunate, but true.
So we've had our peak into the clown car, and the circus is getting ready to start. The media is having a field day with the number and variety of GOP candidates, and I'm all for letting them have their fun. When the Republican convention rolls around, the party will be united and our one candidate will be battle-tested and sharp. I'm optimistic that those of us hoping for a more conservative administration in 2016 will see a GOP making fewer mistakes this time around.
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
A bit of politics: The Republican field begins to take shape...Dr. Ben Carson.
Soon Americans will be bombarded with advertisements, billboards, television commercials and radio messages, explaining why one particular Republican candidate is the best choice to run against Hillary Clinton for president in 2016. The majority of registered voters are Democrats, but the difference doesn't appear to be an issue for the GOP. In fact, when Ronald Reagan was burying Walter Mondale in an electoral landslide in 1984, the majority of registered voters were Democrat. This fact speaks volumes for the idea that in some instances, you really don't know who someone is going to vote for after the curtain closes. Along with many others, I thought Mitt Romney would beat Barack Obama in 2012; the polls showed Romney ahead in both Ohio and Florida on the day before the election. Obviously, some persons who were projected Romney voters, closed those curtains and voted for Obama (not me, I promise). The point being, that it is very difficult to handicap the U.S. Presidential Elections. The primaries, on the other hand, don't present nearly as much of a problem. Take for instance the Democrats in 2016; we have known that Hillary Clinton was going to be the Democratic nominee for years (provided she didn't unexpectedly expire or run off to join the circus). True, the party pretends that a few other possibilities exist, including Martin O'Malley, the former governor of Maryland, and Elizabeth Warren, Senator from Massachusetts who can occasionally be mistaken for Pocahontas. But the nomination has been Hillary's since Obama took the oath of office in 2012. In my mind, Hillary is a very flawed candidate. If I were a Democrat, I would be very worried. Hillary is dealing with controversies about emails and a private server, the Benghazi tragedy, the alleged "Quid Quo Pro" for companies and persons who contributed to the Clinton Foundation, and a less-than-impressive turn as Secretary of State. But, to my surprise, HRC continues to lead all the GOP candidates in every poll I have seen. This fact leaves me both disgusted as sad. After looking at the Bushes and Clintons for decades, I would think that everyone would be as ready as I am for a new face, even if it requires taking a chance on an unknown.
The Republican polling machines already have created a two-tier separation between the candidates. In the top five or six, we have Governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and Texas Senator Ted Cruz, with former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee not far behind. The next group is usually led by Dr. Ben Carson, famed Neurosurgeon and my personal choice, and former Hewlett-Packard/Compaq CEO Carly Fiorina. The rest of the list includes the "unknowns"; those who have yet to decide, including New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Louisiana Governor and another favorite of mine (sorry Jennifer!) Bobby Jindal, former New York Governor George Pataki and recently retired Texas Governor Rick Perry. A big question mark seems to follow former Pennsylvania Senator and 2012 candidate Rick Santorum. I really like Santorum. I have tremendous respect for Santorum; he shows no fear when the time comes to stand up for this issues that are important. When he is given an equal playing field and access to the electorate, Santorum does very well. He speaks well and with conviction, and he is a very intelligent man. Unfortunately, the media and the Democrats (and some of his former Republican opponents), have pinned the ultimate Scarlet Letter to Rick's lapel. You see, Santorum is TOO conservative to be president. He doesn't budge on any of the issues; he's against Gay marriage, pro-Life, supports the Second Amendment, opposes amnesty, and is strongly in favor of entitlement and tax reform. To someone like me, Santorum is not TOO anything. He is just the right amount. He talks about the issues that just might be the keys to turning our country around. No, my issue is not that Rick is too conservative. Its that he is running for an office that he knows in his heart he can't win. If Santorum were to get the GOP nomination, he would unite and mobilize the left in a way we haven't seen since Barry Goldwater. We need a candidate that will appeal to the level-headed Democratic voters who sense the need to abandon the current socialist agenda. I am bothered that Santorum would take a chance on putting another Democrat back in the White House, which is what will happen if he wins the election. It makes me consider that possibly he has fallen victim to the Bush/Clinton fog, which convinces every member of those two families that the United States CAN'T FUNCTION without them.
You probably are able to discern the reasons why I'm supporting Dr. Carson. Many of you may criticize me by pointing out that Carson has about as much chance of beating HRC as Santorum does. I don't accept that argument. Once Carson gets familiar with the podium and the pace of campaigning, he will be a natural. it may seem a bit strained at the moment because he is a neophyte. I find his "newness" refreshing. As for qualifications, Carson has written a number of wonderful books, he has spent a good part of his life caring for other people, and he has dedicated himself to public service OUTSIDE of his occupation. You would be hard-pressed to find a more well-spoken, polite, learned man, and importantly, he is humble. I had some questions regarding his grasp of the wide spectrum of issues that face the president (heck, ignorance of those issues certainly did not affect Obama's decision to run), but lately he has made a concerted effort to address foreign policy, economics, and the social troubles that seem to be about ready to catch this nation on fire. Does it matter to me that he is African-American? Yes, it does. Only in the fact that it might provide him with more access into those communities that are bleeding and suffering the most. I have heard Dr. Carson discuss the inner city neighborhoods of Baltimore, his home. Dr. Carson did not grow up in wealth and opportunity. He is a true American success story, as is Herman Cane. But he never fails to discuss the plight of the poor, inner city youth, who wake up every morning to another day of no options, no opportunities, just suffering. It will be a priority for Dr. Carson, who will, I believe, create a cabinet-level position to focus exclusively on the people who haven't been able to escape to the suburbs. It is an issue worth serious attention and funding.
The Republican polling machines already have created a two-tier separation between the candidates. In the top five or six, we have Governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and Texas Senator Ted Cruz, with former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee not far behind. The next group is usually led by Dr. Ben Carson, famed Neurosurgeon and my personal choice, and former Hewlett-Packard/Compaq CEO Carly Fiorina. The rest of the list includes the "unknowns"; those who have yet to decide, including New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Louisiana Governor and another favorite of mine (sorry Jennifer!) Bobby Jindal, former New York Governor George Pataki and recently retired Texas Governor Rick Perry. A big question mark seems to follow former Pennsylvania Senator and 2012 candidate Rick Santorum. I really like Santorum. I have tremendous respect for Santorum; he shows no fear when the time comes to stand up for this issues that are important. When he is given an equal playing field and access to the electorate, Santorum does very well. He speaks well and with conviction, and he is a very intelligent man. Unfortunately, the media and the Democrats (and some of his former Republican opponents), have pinned the ultimate Scarlet Letter to Rick's lapel. You see, Santorum is TOO conservative to be president. He doesn't budge on any of the issues; he's against Gay marriage, pro-Life, supports the Second Amendment, opposes amnesty, and is strongly in favor of entitlement and tax reform. To someone like me, Santorum is not TOO anything. He is just the right amount. He talks about the issues that just might be the keys to turning our country around. No, my issue is not that Rick is too conservative. Its that he is running for an office that he knows in his heart he can't win. If Santorum were to get the GOP nomination, he would unite and mobilize the left in a way we haven't seen since Barry Goldwater. We need a candidate that will appeal to the level-headed Democratic voters who sense the need to abandon the current socialist agenda. I am bothered that Santorum would take a chance on putting another Democrat back in the White House, which is what will happen if he wins the election. It makes me consider that possibly he has fallen victim to the Bush/Clinton fog, which convinces every member of those two families that the United States CAN'T FUNCTION without them.
You probably are able to discern the reasons why I'm supporting Dr. Carson. Many of you may criticize me by pointing out that Carson has about as much chance of beating HRC as Santorum does. I don't accept that argument. Once Carson gets familiar with the podium and the pace of campaigning, he will be a natural. it may seem a bit strained at the moment because he is a neophyte. I find his "newness" refreshing. As for qualifications, Carson has written a number of wonderful books, he has spent a good part of his life caring for other people, and he has dedicated himself to public service OUTSIDE of his occupation. You would be hard-pressed to find a more well-spoken, polite, learned man, and importantly, he is humble. I had some questions regarding his grasp of the wide spectrum of issues that face the president (heck, ignorance of those issues certainly did not affect Obama's decision to run), but lately he has made a concerted effort to address foreign policy, economics, and the social troubles that seem to be about ready to catch this nation on fire. Does it matter to me that he is African-American? Yes, it does. Only in the fact that it might provide him with more access into those communities that are bleeding and suffering the most. I have heard Dr. Carson discuss the inner city neighborhoods of Baltimore, his home. Dr. Carson did not grow up in wealth and opportunity. He is a true American success story, as is Herman Cane. But he never fails to discuss the plight of the poor, inner city youth, who wake up every morning to another day of no options, no opportunities, just suffering. It will be a priority for Dr. Carson, who will, I believe, create a cabinet-level position to focus exclusively on the people who haven't been able to escape to the suburbs. It is an issue worth serious attention and funding.
Thursday, April 16, 2015
Someone is interested in my opinion regarding the GOP contenders for 2016.
Link: 2016 GOP Candidates
The post which debuts today provides a bit of modest insight into the 2016 presidential campaign of Secretary Hillary Clinton. Actually, I have received more email inquiries regarding my thoughts on the Republican candidates. Is someone out there in the blogosphere assuming that I'm not going to vote Democrat in 2016? Probably a safe bet, so I'm taking the time to share a few observations about the field of Republican candidates that has thus far taken shape. By the way, has Bob Dole made a decision yet?
I like Scott Walker. He really seems like a decent fellow. Geez, do the lefties up there in Wisconsin hate him. I like Walker because he understands just how far out of balance our relationship with organized Unions has become. My father was digging coal out of the mountains in Harlan County, Kentucky, when he was twelve years old. I fully understand the need for workers to create a Union. Working together for fair pay, competitive benefits, and a safe working environment is as American as it gets. But somewhere along the line, the major Unions in this country graduated from "Unionizing" to "Politicizing". Once the Unions became politicized, the criminal element was introduced. The struggle in Wisconsin was a real microcosm of the selfish, damaging attitude that many Unions express today. When Scott Walker realized that Wisconsin was in a financial mess that could only be solved with sacrifices, he demanded that everyone participate in the process. No one was too good to compromise and give up a little to right the ship of state. He took on a tough opponent, but he stood strong for ALL the people of Wisconsin, and in the end, he won. In the past month, a bit of hay has been made about the fact that Gov. Walker dropped out of University before finishing his degree. Normally, it would make no difference to me, but when I heard Walker himself claim that he was just a semester away from graduating, I was perplexed. In fact, a review of Marquette University records shows that he was more than a semester away from graduating. It was more likely a year and some change. If a great job opportunity offered itself when I was still a year away, I would have taken the job, with the intention of finishing the degree later. My real concern with Gov. Walker is that regionally, he doesn't help his own candidacy. He has failed to deliver his own state in the last two presidential elections (he's not alone), and, Walker or no Walker, the GOP will not win Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin.
I also like Rand Paul. For those of you who are loyal readers of my blog, God Bless You. Also, you will recall that last month I was a bit angry with Senator Paul regarding his comments on Cuba. He has since revisited those comments to my satisfaction. Rand Paul is intelligent, charming, good at raising money, and comes from an important state (Not Kentucky, but Ohio, just next door!). I fully approve of his stated positions on Obamacare, immigration and the economy. As for everything else, I'm a bit in the dark. I can't help but worry that unless he has stated otherwise, I can assume that his opinion is the same as his father's (Rep. Ron Paul of Texas). Sorry, folks, but I'm against legalizing drugs. The reason the War on Drugs has failed is because it hasn't been enforced stringently enough. I'm also a little wary of Rand Paul's foreign policy positions. He has a bunch of work to do in that arena. Ted Cruz is someone else who really appeals to me at certain times. He is able to discuss the intricacies of international economics and how it impacts the average American, and immediately switch over to an in depth analysis of the last three ballistic missile treaties with Russia. This guy is sharp, and I am convinced he loves Texas, which goes a long way with me. Cruz is intelligent and crafty enough to be President, but he has a tendency to piss people off. I worry that a Cruz nomination creates a President Hillary. Another concern: my old man told me never to trust a man without any lips.
I love Dr. Ben Carson. In a totally platonic way, of course. This gentleman is kind, compassionate, brilliant, charming, and black. I would love to see the GOP nominate an African-American who loves his country, to follow-up the one the Democrats gave us, who in my opinion, doesn't. We are an inclusive America, and the Republican field of candidates (so far) includes an African-American and a Hispanic-American. If Elizabeth Warren, Martin O'Malley, and Jim Webb can be coaxed into the race against Hillary (don't count on it), then the Democrats will be represented by four Caucasian politicians.....interesting. Dr. Carson would bring the experience of a neurosurgeon to the White House. He is also the sum of his beginnings, and he remembers the days of frightful discrimination that our nation struggled through. Like most, I'm in the dark regarding his foreign policy ideas. I would also like to hear his thoughts on immigration and the real-time problems we are having on the border. Another possible candidate is former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. I'm afraid that for me, that boat has sailed. And lets hope that its a study boat, because the Governor appears to have put on much of the weight that he so famously lost a few years back.
Speaking of large folks, I don't think Chris Christie will be running in 2016. He has been obliged to deflect quite a bit of negative press (much of it undeserved). But Christie is a smart politician and a young man. he would be best advised to continue focusing on getting healthy (which the average American sees as an admirable accomplishment) and looking toward either 2020 or 2024. What about Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush is a very nice man. I'm sure he is a wonderful father and a dedicated family man. He comes from good stock, that's for sure. But when it comes to delivering Florida for the GOP, he has failed terribly. In fact, if he were the GOP candidate, there's no guarantee that he would be able to deliver Florida in 2016. He has done some really good things as governor, but I'm taking a hiatus on voting for Bushes for President. No more Clintons and no more Bushes. At least for a few more years, please.
I won't spend much time on Marco Rubio. He's a charming man, speaks well, and is destined for great things. I think its a bit early for Marco, but he has to try the waters eventually. He has been a bit inconsistent regarding immigration, which is one of the top three issues pour moi. He is forty-three years old, but doesn't look a day over thirty. This will not help during a national campaign, when the average voter is looking for wisdom and experience. Also, he has been unable to deliver Florida. That is a very important factor in my book. Its one of the reasons I lean towards Rand Paul. Long before he was a presidential candidate, Rand Paul was helping to turn Kentucky from a borderline blue state into the solid red state that it is today. That effort cannot be undervalued. But as things stand today, given my lack of knowledge regarding some important positions taken by various candidates, I would say that on April 14, 2015, were the primary today, I would vote for Dr. Ben Carson, with Senator Rand Paul my second choice.
The post which debuts today provides a bit of modest insight into the 2016 presidential campaign of Secretary Hillary Clinton. Actually, I have received more email inquiries regarding my thoughts on the Republican candidates. Is someone out there in the blogosphere assuming that I'm not going to vote Democrat in 2016? Probably a safe bet, so I'm taking the time to share a few observations about the field of Republican candidates that has thus far taken shape. By the way, has Bob Dole made a decision yet?
I like Scott Walker. He really seems like a decent fellow. Geez, do the lefties up there in Wisconsin hate him. I like Walker because he understands just how far out of balance our relationship with organized Unions has become. My father was digging coal out of the mountains in Harlan County, Kentucky, when he was twelve years old. I fully understand the need for workers to create a Union. Working together for fair pay, competitive benefits, and a safe working environment is as American as it gets. But somewhere along the line, the major Unions in this country graduated from "Unionizing" to "Politicizing". Once the Unions became politicized, the criminal element was introduced. The struggle in Wisconsin was a real microcosm of the selfish, damaging attitude that many Unions express today. When Scott Walker realized that Wisconsin was in a financial mess that could only be solved with sacrifices, he demanded that everyone participate in the process. No one was too good to compromise and give up a little to right the ship of state. He took on a tough opponent, but he stood strong for ALL the people of Wisconsin, and in the end, he won. In the past month, a bit of hay has been made about the fact that Gov. Walker dropped out of University before finishing his degree. Normally, it would make no difference to me, but when I heard Walker himself claim that he was just a semester away from graduating, I was perplexed. In fact, a review of Marquette University records shows that he was more than a semester away from graduating. It was more likely a year and some change. If a great job opportunity offered itself when I was still a year away, I would have taken the job, with the intention of finishing the degree later. My real concern with Gov. Walker is that regionally, he doesn't help his own candidacy. He has failed to deliver his own state in the last two presidential elections (he's not alone), and, Walker or no Walker, the GOP will not win Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin.
I also like Rand Paul. For those of you who are loyal readers of my blog, God Bless You. Also, you will recall that last month I was a bit angry with Senator Paul regarding his comments on Cuba. He has since revisited those comments to my satisfaction. Rand Paul is intelligent, charming, good at raising money, and comes from an important state (Not Kentucky, but Ohio, just next door!). I fully approve of his stated positions on Obamacare, immigration and the economy. As for everything else, I'm a bit in the dark. I can't help but worry that unless he has stated otherwise, I can assume that his opinion is the same as his father's (Rep. Ron Paul of Texas). Sorry, folks, but I'm against legalizing drugs. The reason the War on Drugs has failed is because it hasn't been enforced stringently enough. I'm also a little wary of Rand Paul's foreign policy positions. He has a bunch of work to do in that arena. Ted Cruz is someone else who really appeals to me at certain times. He is able to discuss the intricacies of international economics and how it impacts the average American, and immediately switch over to an in depth analysis of the last three ballistic missile treaties with Russia. This guy is sharp, and I am convinced he loves Texas, which goes a long way with me. Cruz is intelligent and crafty enough to be President, but he has a tendency to piss people off. I worry that a Cruz nomination creates a President Hillary. Another concern: my old man told me never to trust a man without any lips.
I love Dr. Ben Carson. In a totally platonic way, of course. This gentleman is kind, compassionate, brilliant, charming, and black. I would love to see the GOP nominate an African-American who loves his country, to follow-up the one the Democrats gave us, who in my opinion, doesn't. We are an inclusive America, and the Republican field of candidates (so far) includes an African-American and a Hispanic-American. If Elizabeth Warren, Martin O'Malley, and Jim Webb can be coaxed into the race against Hillary (don't count on it), then the Democrats will be represented by four Caucasian politicians.....interesting. Dr. Carson would bring the experience of a neurosurgeon to the White House. He is also the sum of his beginnings, and he remembers the days of frightful discrimination that our nation struggled through. Like most, I'm in the dark regarding his foreign policy ideas. I would also like to hear his thoughts on immigration and the real-time problems we are having on the border. Another possible candidate is former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee. I'm afraid that for me, that boat has sailed. And lets hope that its a study boat, because the Governor appears to have put on much of the weight that he so famously lost a few years back.
Speaking of large folks, I don't think Chris Christie will be running in 2016. He has been obliged to deflect quite a bit of negative press (much of it undeserved). But Christie is a smart politician and a young man. he would be best advised to continue focusing on getting healthy (which the average American sees as an admirable accomplishment) and looking toward either 2020 or 2024. What about Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush is a very nice man. I'm sure he is a wonderful father and a dedicated family man. He comes from good stock, that's for sure. But when it comes to delivering Florida for the GOP, he has failed terribly. In fact, if he were the GOP candidate, there's no guarantee that he would be able to deliver Florida in 2016. He has done some really good things as governor, but I'm taking a hiatus on voting for Bushes for President. No more Clintons and no more Bushes. At least for a few more years, please.
I won't spend much time on Marco Rubio. He's a charming man, speaks well, and is destined for great things. I think its a bit early for Marco, but he has to try the waters eventually. He has been a bit inconsistent regarding immigration, which is one of the top three issues pour moi. He is forty-three years old, but doesn't look a day over thirty. This will not help during a national campaign, when the average voter is looking for wisdom and experience. Also, he has been unable to deliver Florida. That is a very important factor in my book. Its one of the reasons I lean towards Rand Paul. Long before he was a presidential candidate, Rand Paul was helping to turn Kentucky from a borderline blue state into the solid red state that it is today. That effort cannot be undervalued. But as things stand today, given my lack of knowledge regarding some important positions taken by various candidates, I would say that on April 14, 2015, were the primary today, I would vote for Dr. Ben Carson, with Senator Rand Paul my second choice.
Sunday, December 14, 2014
Please Excuse The Tinest Bit Of Politics
Links A. Will Hillary Clinton Run In 2016?
B. Romney Looking Like A Candidate For 2016
C. Another Bush Eyes The Oval Office
The 2016 election began the moment Mitt Romney conceded the 2012 race to Barrack Obama. The Republican power-brokers (who appear to exclusively be Members of Congress) were quoted all over the media about the need to find "new blood" and "fresh faces" to lead the GOP into this new century. I agreed; because of reasons not unrelated to tradition and loyalty, Republicans always seem to chose the candidate who has "put in the time". In 2012 Mitt Romney's candidacy and eventual nomination as GOP standard bearer seemed predestined, even with a couple grumbles from Rick Santorum. A month before the actual election, it appeared that Mitt as in the driver's seat. All the polls showed Romney in the lead, and he avoided any terrible missteps in the less-than-inspiring final debate. Not only did Romney lose, but he lost every single battleground state (except maybe Florida; I can't remember how Florida finally ended). So as 2014 comes to a close, who is on top of all the major polls for the 2016 Republican nomination? Why Mitt Romney, of course. I don't mind Romney and I believe he would make a decent President, but what I do mind is his obvious belief that the United States cannot survive without a President Romney. Why else would someone run for the office three consecutive times (you will recall that before John McCain got hot, Romney was leading the GOP race in 2008)?
And if Romney were to decide against running in 2016 (fat chance), who else is making noise on the Republican side? Jeb Bush. As if the name "Bush" is all America needs to regain the edge. I'm sorry, but I'm not ready for another Bush. I like some of the younger Bushes who seem to have their own ideas and ambitions, but enough time hasn't passed for me to jump back onto that Bandwagon. I like Jeb as much as I like Mitt, but it just ain't gonna happen. I will not support a Bush for the Republican nomination in 2016 (unless Barbara decides to run). Rick Santorum is another face that refuses to go away. I prefer Rick to Mitt and Jeb, but he has about as much chance as Osama Bin Laden's corpse of getting elected President in 2016. I mean no disrespect, but I can't support a candidate who is so polarizing that the Democratic nominee would win in a landslide (and I like the fact that Santorum does not run away from his Catholic faith). I'm hearing Beltway rumors that Mike Huckobee is considering a run. Oy Vey! Thank goodness for Chris Christie, who I don't particularly support, and Rand Paul, who I like, for bringing a bit of variety into the conversation. Rick Perry? Rick missed his opportunity in 2012, and Ted Cruz isn't quite ready for prime time.
On the Democrat side, I've heard three names mentioned repeatedly: Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, and Joe Biden (snicker). In plain English, the nomination is Hillary's for the asking, and ask she will. Her syncophants have lately tried to spread the idea that Hillary may not run, either for medical or unrelated personal reasons. Give me a break. Hillary has been running for President ever since Bill left office. Hillary wants to be President because she craves authority; its a large part of her nature. She believes that she is more intelligent than most people and therefore deserves to be in a decision-making position. Unfortunately for Hillary, she was a terrible Secretary of State, with a degrading and compromising treaty with Russia (New Start Treaty) as her only achievement. I can't imagine the "Hillary 2016" tour is going to highlight Clinton's diplomacy vis-a-vis Vladimir Putin as reason to trust her foreign policy acumen, and we haven't even gotten to Benghazi. Elizabeth Warren, the darling of the left-of-left modern hippies that appear to be all that's left of the Obama base, will probably run in order to keep her name and future options fresh. Biden may run out of vanity alone, but everyday he seems to morph into an even larger baboon, and I can't imagine the Democratic power-brokers allowing Joe to make a complete ass of himself (anymore than usual, that is).
The point of this post is to release a bit of steam that has been collecting in my gizzard regarding the persons who appear to be running for President in 2016. For the life of me, I just don't understand why certain politically prolific persons refuse to retire. In the old days (pre-1990), people would run for President once, maybe twice, and then just drift away with dignity and manners. Today, we have a new breed of politicians who will hold on for life to whatever bit of power the electorate has seen fit to bestow. Jeez, how I'm sick of the same old faces delivering the same old platitudes. At least the GOP has a few new names on the list. I can't imagine what the Democrats would do without Hillary.
B. Romney Looking Like A Candidate For 2016
C. Another Bush Eyes The Oval Office
The 2016 election began the moment Mitt Romney conceded the 2012 race to Barrack Obama. The Republican power-brokers (who appear to exclusively be Members of Congress) were quoted all over the media about the need to find "new blood" and "fresh faces" to lead the GOP into this new century. I agreed; because of reasons not unrelated to tradition and loyalty, Republicans always seem to chose the candidate who has "put in the time". In 2012 Mitt Romney's candidacy and eventual nomination as GOP standard bearer seemed predestined, even with a couple grumbles from Rick Santorum. A month before the actual election, it appeared that Mitt as in the driver's seat. All the polls showed Romney in the lead, and he avoided any terrible missteps in the less-than-inspiring final debate. Not only did Romney lose, but he lost every single battleground state (except maybe Florida; I can't remember how Florida finally ended). So as 2014 comes to a close, who is on top of all the major polls for the 2016 Republican nomination? Why Mitt Romney, of course. I don't mind Romney and I believe he would make a decent President, but what I do mind is his obvious belief that the United States cannot survive without a President Romney. Why else would someone run for the office three consecutive times (you will recall that before John McCain got hot, Romney was leading the GOP race in 2008)?
And if Romney were to decide against running in 2016 (fat chance), who else is making noise on the Republican side? Jeb Bush. As if the name "Bush" is all America needs to regain the edge. I'm sorry, but I'm not ready for another Bush. I like some of the younger Bushes who seem to have their own ideas and ambitions, but enough time hasn't passed for me to jump back onto that Bandwagon. I like Jeb as much as I like Mitt, but it just ain't gonna happen. I will not support a Bush for the Republican nomination in 2016 (unless Barbara decides to run). Rick Santorum is another face that refuses to go away. I prefer Rick to Mitt and Jeb, but he has about as much chance as Osama Bin Laden's corpse of getting elected President in 2016. I mean no disrespect, but I can't support a candidate who is so polarizing that the Democratic nominee would win in a landslide (and I like the fact that Santorum does not run away from his Catholic faith). I'm hearing Beltway rumors that Mike Huckobee is considering a run. Oy Vey! Thank goodness for Chris Christie, who I don't particularly support, and Rand Paul, who I like, for bringing a bit of variety into the conversation. Rick Perry? Rick missed his opportunity in 2012, and Ted Cruz isn't quite ready for prime time.
On the Democrat side, I've heard three names mentioned repeatedly: Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, and Joe Biden (snicker). In plain English, the nomination is Hillary's for the asking, and ask she will. Her syncophants have lately tried to spread the idea that Hillary may not run, either for medical or unrelated personal reasons. Give me a break. Hillary has been running for President ever since Bill left office. Hillary wants to be President because she craves authority; its a large part of her nature. She believes that she is more intelligent than most people and therefore deserves to be in a decision-making position. Unfortunately for Hillary, she was a terrible Secretary of State, with a degrading and compromising treaty with Russia (New Start Treaty) as her only achievement. I can't imagine the "Hillary 2016" tour is going to highlight Clinton's diplomacy vis-a-vis Vladimir Putin as reason to trust her foreign policy acumen, and we haven't even gotten to Benghazi. Elizabeth Warren, the darling of the left-of-left modern hippies that appear to be all that's left of the Obama base, will probably run in order to keep her name and future options fresh. Biden may run out of vanity alone, but everyday he seems to morph into an even larger baboon, and I can't imagine the Democratic power-brokers allowing Joe to make a complete ass of himself (anymore than usual, that is).
The point of this post is to release a bit of steam that has been collecting in my gizzard regarding the persons who appear to be running for President in 2016. For the life of me, I just don't understand why certain politically prolific persons refuse to retire. In the old days (pre-1990), people would run for President once, maybe twice, and then just drift away with dignity and manners. Today, we have a new breed of politicians who will hold on for life to whatever bit of power the electorate has seen fit to bestow. Jeez, how I'm sick of the same old faces delivering the same old platitudes. At least the GOP has a few new names on the list. I can't imagine what the Democrats would do without Hillary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)