So what is my problem with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, anyway? Although I did have a very short, pleasant conversation with her once. I won't pretend to be a confident. A review of Bill and Hillary Clinton over the past four decades, convinces me that they are obsessed with power and money. With Bill you can add "sex" to the list, but with Hillary you can add "ideology". The Clintons are elitists, but who isn't in DC politics these days? Members of Congress begin raising money and running for re-election the day after they are sworn in. Almost immediately the focus turns to lobbyists, entitlements, and most importantly, committee appointments. For some reason, people who are able to find a place in the DC political scene, always eventually become millionaires, and never seem to leave. Who can blame the Clintons for wanting to stay part of the elite, especially after Bill spent eight years as President at a young age, relatively speaking?
For Hillary, its not all about money and influence. Hillary is a political ideologue. She believes that she knows what is best for the world, and she is determined to leave her mark. Its not wise to disagree with her perspective, because she is dedicated to the principle that "the ends justifies the means", esepcially when you've earned your place amongst the elites. We've seen it time and time again. Hillary will obfuscate, confuse, and break the law to reach her goals. In a recent manifestation of this habit, Hillary decided that security regulations did not apply to her (one of the elite), therefore she was going to install a private server and use it to occasionally (giving her the benefit of the doubt here) send and receive classified information. Once the server was discovered, the goal became to survive the controversy without jeopardizing her run for the presidency. Again, evidence destroyed, laws broken- actions justified because the end goal, becoming president, was what mattered.
Keeping all this in mind, my problem with Hillary Clinton has more to do with timing than anything else. She is running for president at a very delicate time in our nation's history. Our economy has ground to a halt and we are no longer create jobs, our immigration system is an invitation to all the needy of the world, and terrorism continues to knock on the front door (but now the knock is coming from the inside). I don't believe that I have the luxury to whine and complain about Hillary's willingness to destroy people who stand in her way, or her willingness to lie about the cause of the Benghazi riot that cost us the lives of four brave Americans. I'm very worried about the survival of our political, social, and economic system. Hillary's bad habits will have to wait for my attention.
Simply put, we can't exist as a soveriegn nation as long as our borders are unprotected. The effort to encourage foreign nationals to enter the United States illegally is nothing short of treason, but I'm no longer interested in talking about Barack Obama. If Hillary Clinton wins the election, she will inact an Amnesty program (with or without Congress) that will provide between fifteen and twenty million persons who have been living in this country illegally, with the right to vote. Amnesty is nothing short of rewarding people for breaking our laws, and punishing those who attempt to become US citizens legally. But Hillary's goal is not to provide relief to twenty million people who, through their own actions, are caught in a very difficult place; her goal is to create millions of more Democratic voters. The end game will morph the United States into a one-party nation. Where will the GOP go to find millions of voters to balance the new political equation? I guess the Republicans could accuse the Democrats of racism, and falsely claim that Democrats are going to take away a woman's right to choose and make old people eat out of trash cans, but that example of fear politics has already been perfected by the Democrats themselves.
Aside from immigration, I am concerned with the future of the Supreme Court. The next president will be able to impact the Court in ways that the country has never experienced. If Hillary Clinton is allowed to nominate four, maybe five leftist activist Justices in the mould of Sonia Sotomayor, what impact do you think this will have on the Constitution? It brings us back to Ideology. No doubt Hillary wants to be President so she can "encourage" government to interpret the Constitution as she does. What does that mean for persons concerned about the Second Amendment? How long will it be before Bibles are outlawed in public, and Churches instructed to alter their appearance, so as to not offend persons of other faiths who might be driving by?
Certainly I'm bothered by Hillary Clinton's attitude and history of deceit and corruption. But this election is more about who she will become as opposed to who she is today. She wants to be the President who ushers in a new era of Amnesty and open botders, and she wants to be Commander and Chief who finally succeeds in taking all the guns away. These are the reasons why I will do everything I can (legally of course- I'm a Republican), up until the morning of November ninth, to see that she is not elected President of the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment